Friday, August 26, 2016

Restoring Sanctuary b Sandra L Bloom

For me, this was the most informative book I’ve read in years, just the opposite of the library’s September book club choice of “Station Eleven”.  I learned so much from this one book – it reminded me of, “An Unnecessary Woman”, in that this book will cause me to read half a dozen others.  When you’re an old dog, it’s a pleasure to find that you can still learn a new trick.  This book taught me a lot of new tricks.  Just me, mind you; these “Sanctuary” people have been around for decades. I guess it’s the whole ACEs focus that has shined the light on this area of primary and secondary trauma; specifically care-giver secondary trauma.



I self-identify as a “community organizer”.  I found this Sanctuary strategy/philosophy useful for any organization.  It’s written for people in Human Services organizations, but I found I could easily substitute the words “Grand Jury” for “Human Services” organization.  It’s probably good stuff even for the Friends of the Library.

The compelling message is subtle and nuanced: on the surface it seems like platitudes that most organizations think they accept, and follow, but when you understand the seven value-statements that must be adhered to, it represents a dramatic cultural change in the organization, which will take time and training and learning to adopt.

The Platitudes:

“Ever new developmental experience means learning something new and giving up something old.”

“Members need to feel that they are part of something bigger than themselves.”

”We must learn to listen to other people, integrate ideas and concepts, negotiate and compromise, and learn to recognize that there is no single absolute truth in a situation, but only the shared process of seeking the truth.”

“All members need to feel that their opinions matter and that their participation in decision making, monitoring and evaluating progress is important and useful.”

 

The Seven Commitments:

Commitment to Growth and Change

As organizations we must find ways to manage the anxiety associated with change while allowing, encouraging, and propelling change.

Commitment to Democracy

The leveling of hierarchy is a critical component to creating and sustaining an environment that allows an organization to share common goals and methods for reaching those goals.

Commitment to Nonviolence

Organizations must be physically, psychologically, socially, and morally safe; requiring a dedication to creating nonviolent environments.

Commitment to Emotional Intelligence

Establish the critical goal of constantly working together to make that which is unconscious conscious and to manage emotions that threaten to overwhelm our capacity to think while integrating emotional information into our decision making. 

Commitment to Social Learning

Reduce the odds of making mistakes by drawing on the knowledge, experience, and wisdom of a diverse group of other people.

Commitment to Open Communication

Everyone must learn how to promote dialog over discussion, and find shared meaning, to achieve complex reasoning & problem solving.

Commitment to Social Responsibility

Organizations should further the common good in the interest of both individual and collective justice.
 

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Station Eleven by Emily St John Mandel


For me, this was the worst book I’ve read in years.  And I don’t mind reading bad writing: it can be a positive experience critiquing them.
However, the pace was so slow, that when I got about 100 pages in, when the story was doing a time-shift, I got an interesting book from the library’s new-shelf called, “The Passenger” by Lisa Lutz, also 300 pages.  I started at noon and finished just after 8:00 pm.  It had a riveting plot with deep characters, action and surprises, and I learned something.

All those things were missing from “Eleven”.  Fast-paced plot(?) – there seemed to be a dozen plots, held together not by a web of steel, but little meandering rivulets of tenuous water.  Deep characters(?) – I would pass on a free glass of Grande Dame Veuve Clicquot, rather than sit with any of them; they’re not just boring, but despicable.  Then again, we’ve never been allowed beyond their surface veneer.

It certainly wasn’t “compelling”, as Ann Patchett promised.  I didn’t find it “lyrical” as did the Seattle Times.  There was nothing “tender and lovely” about the book at all in my opinion.

Then plot again – plot needs ups and downs, successes and failures, maybe even an end-goal.  My “Lutz” book had murders and love stories, suspense and secrets, with sprinklings of mayhem and reckoning.

Sometimes these sorts of tales are written because of a life’s cause like Global Warming, or big pharma, or the Military-Industrial Complex.  I found none of that sort of passion here: no message.

The writing is thin and yet cluttered.  3-4 time-frames is two too many for this author.  And who cares anyway?  There was no development of a thread; not a person, nor a cause.  There was just minimal scene painting.  I disliked each and every character.

I was not surprised to get to page 200 [the airplanes], and find that the writing style was the same, and on purpose – more characters, more points of view.  I guess in the spirit of readership stamina, the target was nothing less that the gold medal.

Again, my pace was ten pages a session, and by the time I had read 200 pages, I had found another interesting book.  I had passed on an Anne Rice book and the person said, “Oh, I love Anne Rice.”  I replied, “This is not a werewolf book.”  The rejoinder was, ”I love her other stuff”.  So, I did some research and found “Belinda,” of which I’d never heard.  Wow, first class writing: Anne Rice at her best.  This had “lyricism”, poetic descriptions of her native New Orleans, juxtapositioned with the Haight in San Francisco.  It had “tender and lovely” moments, as when Jeremy and Alex share their more intimate encounters.  It was a lot of things, and I wanted to read the under aged sex [Lolita] bits, before I passed it on.

These 400 pages took only a few days: why not – good writer, great plotline, narrow scope, and lots of ups and downs, focused – that was Belinda.

Back to “Eleven”; was there any meaning to all of this?  Now we had the interrogator/journalist, were these 30’s/90’s icons, for or against the state?  “Who’s on first. No what’s on second”, Marx Brothers type dialog.

I lost where I was, never sure what was being said – Fin de Siècle.

Monday, June 6, 2016

A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki


A Year of Meats (1998) had the same time blend, past and present.  It had the same composure of Space, as well, Japan and the USA.  There’s nothing new under the sun.

 

She was there in All Over Creation (2004), too.  Is she writing the same story, over and over, with new characters to keep things spicy?  Nothing wrong with that, many of my favorite authors do just that. 

 

 

But Ruth is not a master writer, not much of a professional one either, three books in 25 years.  No, she’s no Robert Parker, who ground out fifty variations of the same book in a similar 25 years.  His Spenser was an alter-ego.  He wrote himself as an almost super-hero, with an African-American side-kick.  No ego with Ruth Ozeki, she simply blatantly writes about herself because it’s easier and she wants to communicate her thoughts on life, the world, and her metaphysical ponderings.  The book is a canvas for her with which to paint her story.

 

I’ve read each of Ruth’s three books now.  There’s a pattern here.  She’s always well-researched, always entertaining, and always writes about herself.  She’s not a typical writer.  Well, she’s not an author.  She simply uses the written word to tell us about the seemingly many interests in her life.

 

The alternating chapters didn’t work well for her.  It does for some authors, but didn’t work for Ruth.  It seemed as though it might have been a good device in the beginning, but then she sort of painted herself in the corner and couldn’t get out without metaphysical time-space jumps which got almost Science-Fictiony.

Friday, April 15, 2016

Lab Girl by Hope Jahren


This is the story that asks the question, “Can this girl, from a little mining town in the west, find happiness as the wife a wealthy and titled Englishman, Lord Henry Winthrop?”

Wrong story.  This story tells the tale of a little girl from Lake Woebegon, who moves away from the land of Norwegian bachelor farmers, to seek fame and fortune as a scientist in a Berkeley biology laboratory. 

This is a brilliantly inspirational book for any budding, young scientist.  In a quietly unassuming way, Hope interweaves her memoir (how she got there), with what being a scientist really is really all about, and this, interspersed with those personal perspectives, she tells us the story of earth-based plant life on this planet. 

The tri-theme is an accepted approach these days for authors.  It’s done in order to be considered by the broadest of readership markets.  In Hope’s case, and she’s done a great job of this, she’s blended the memoir category by every fifth chapter or so, including an early childhood remembrance of her mother or father.  She’s captured the novel segment, by mixing in her philosophical musings on what it takes to be a scientist [extreme devotion and boringly hard work], along with her predictably non-sex life, almost monastic life-style.  But getting back to inspirational, she paints this monastic picture akin to some sort of Nun’s biography, devoted to a passionate cause, a greater cause, and one, in the end, which supersedes thoughts of a big kitchen, lots of rug rats, the PTA and a bridge club.

I’ve been focused this past year, on books that I can strongly recommend for Sonoma County teens.  These have generally been for younger teens.  This is a book I recommend for middle to older teens.  The author, Hope, wrote it to inspire girls, but everything she says is equally relevant to boys, some of whom likewise feel alone, different, and more thoughtful than the others.  This is for any teen who is interested in learning.  It’s for those who recognize that they are passionate about a subject.

Doesn’t matter what the subject is, the subject will change over time.  If the passion to learn is burning, it will survive the wanting and getting more education.  This could lead possibly to a career in science, or the arts, or who knows, politics.

Das LavendelZimmer by Nina george


I was hooked once the author’s protagonist recommended, “The Elegance of the Hedgehog”.  This took place ten pages into the story, after the book seller is introduced to us.  Not a normal bookseller at all.  He has converted a river barge into an “Apothocary Library” on the River Seine, in the middle of Paris.  His homeopathic apothecary has the cures for modern life’s travails

A cast of loveable characters is quickly added to the ship, which hasn’t moved away from the dock in twenty years.  That fact introduced as a hint that the reader would soon be joining the crew in a long journey of literary exploration. 


 
We got hints early on that while the bookstore proprietor was possessed of the unique ability at “transperception”, this did not apply to his own problems, which seemed to revolve around a woman.
 

I need say no more.

It’s a little schmaltzy, but that goes without saying for any romantic comedy.  Just like a stage play from the 1920’s, by the end, after many zany adventures, all the characters pair up, and live happily ever after.

 

Sunday, March 27, 2016

The Distance Between Us by Reyna Grande


This is a quietly unassuming, new-wave Americana memoir.  I’m a big supporter of memoir writers.  This form of writing can be cathartic.  It certainly allows one to better understand oneself and to reflect on the critical moments of one’s life.  Reyna seems to be smart and skilled at painting a scene in words.

Because it is a Latina memoir, we have to expect a little more Spanish language dialog than we normally run across in a fictional coming-of-age novel.  I think the author and editor made the right decision to go against the grain and call this a memoir up front.  That was a brave decision because it certainly limited her potential readership.  I thought it allowed her to more completely be herself, rather than forcing herself to think like a gringa. 

Reyna does an excellent job of writing a believable, pre-school character.  This is unlike last month’s McDermott, who didn’t convince me with her childhood remembrances.  Reyna doesn’t stretch for adult-like memories.  I’m guessing this difference is cultural.  The Latin culture of large families with emotional interactions probably led Reyna to discuss her childhood, the good and the bad, extensively within the family.  McDermott’s character was quiet, unemotional, and detached.

Another thing that seemed to work well for Reyna’s writing was staying on point at being the recording secretary, the diarist for this history.  The temptation is always great when writing a memoir vignette to expand the central character to grand proportions with deep thoughts and contemplative motivations.  Reyna’s life is described as though she were a leaf in the wind: blown this way and that, barely able to make it to the next short-term landing spot.

I thought last winter’s Sonoma County Reads, “Into the Beautiful North”, was a good book that could be enjoyed by teens and so I donated a dozen copies to the County jail system, half in Spanish, half in English.  This book is equally as good, but from a different angle.  “North” was an action-adventure that would be fun for teens; “Distance” is an inspirational book providing hope for those in the struggle to be American.  I’ll be donating three in each language to the Juvenile Justice Center.

Thursday, February 25, 2016

The Grand Jury Wants You


The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury will be holding five Q&A sessions in March at various Libraries across the County.
These one-hour discussions may be of interest to:
n  Prospective jurors: next year’s Civil Grand Jury
n  Citizens wondering, what is the Civil Grand Jury
n  Citizens with complaints about local government

We will have applications for the 2016-2017 Jury.
We will have information pamphlets available.
We will have complaint forms as well.


 
The five scheduled meetings are:






n  Wednesday, March 9th  Guerneville Regional Library
                                           5:30 – 6:30       14107 Armstrong Woods Rd.
                                                                           Guerneville, CA 95446.
                                                                           (707) 869-9004
  n  Friday, March 11th  Rohnert Park Cotati Regional Library
                                                                         3:30 – 4:30        6250 Lynne Condé Way
                                                                         Rohnert Park, CA 94928
                                                                                   (707) 584-9121
 n   Saturday,  March 12th    Petaluma Regional Library
                                                         11am – noon    100 Fairgrounds Drive
                                                                                        Petaluma, CA 94952.
                                                                                        (707) 763-9801
 n  Tuesday, March 15th  Sonoma Valley Regional Library
                                                2 – 3 pm           755 West Napa Street
                                                       Sonoma, CA 95476
                                                              (707) 996-5217
  n  Wednesday, March 16th  Sebastopol Regional Library
                                                      4 – 5 pm           7140 Bodega Avenue
                                                                                  Sebastopol, CA 95472.
                                                                                      (707) 823-7691
Application Deadline for the 2016-2017 Jury is April 6th, 2016.

Friday, February 19, 2016

Someone by Alice mcDermitt


Trite – banal – boring. That about sums it up.

I certainly thought I recognized the author’s name when the book was passed out for out Library Book Club.  When I went to the “Also By” page in front, however, I didn’t know any of the titles.  She’s had a book published every five years since the nineties.  I’ve kept track of most everything I’ve read since about then and not a wisp of her.

Probably like most readers, for each one I finish, there are three others where I either browse a few lines here and there, or take out (or buy) and then stop after a chapter or two.  I think Alice McDermott falls in the latter category.  I’d bet there’s one of her books on my bookshelf with a dog-ear, 40 pages in.

For me, this was a bad retro rewrite attempt at Betty Smith’s, “A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.”    There was nothing new in “Someone”.    No sparkle     I wanted Gene Kelly and Frankie out “On The Town”. 

No hopes, no dreams – a funeral parlor?   I get that this was sort of her idea, just someone, nobody special.  But there’s a reason successful authors write about special people  --  it’s interesting ! ! ! or at least entertaining.  This book was neither.

The writing was sophomoronic – she used all the [see my opening line] gimmicks taught in memoirs IA.  This works if the author can balance achieving disbelief (in her remembering all these “growing up” images) with the sorts of things a child remembers (p.47 – “There was a tall brown dresser against one wall, Mr. Hanson’s doorman’s cap on top of it and, between two windows, a dressing table with perfume bottles and jars of cream and a silver-backed brush still threaded with Mrs. Hanson’s black hair.”) age 9.

Quite often I am known to suggest that an author had a great short story, but then the publisher made them expand it into a novel for commercial reasons.  Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn’t.  In McDermott’s case, I fear she wrote an epic novel to start with and the publisher kindly chopped the middle of it out.  What’s left is a two-part book – both parts short stories – fictionalized memoirs.  Well, maybe not so fictionalized.  McDermott is at that age where one has to start dealing with the aging and death of parents. 

That’s probably where all these themes in this current book are coming from. 

Maybe it’s not fiction at all.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

The Accidental Universe by Alan Lightman


This book was a collection of lectures on cosmology.  I thought I’d make the gist of my comments about further readings, sometimes podcasts, that each “chapter” of his brought to mind for me.
This was a new format for me to use in writing about a book.  So I asked my muse (ex-wife Gisela, if it would work).  She wrote:
All the links work if you pay attention and use Ctrl Click. It will ask you to do that..  For the Scientific American podcast it will ask you to subscribe to Apple iTunes RSS, but it works without it.  For YouTube it opens the webpages, but if you don't pay attention you don't see them, because they open behind the browser page, This might be idiosyncratic to my computer, but then, maybe not.  What I am trying to say is: every link works if you take your time and pay attention. None of them work with just a mouse click.  GISELA

1. The Accidental Universe
The lead-off lecture is on the mind-bending theory of the Multiverse.  I’ve picked up on the article, 5 Reasons We May Live in a Multiverse[1] (click below), written by Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com December 07, 2012.
But there was also the introduction of the idea of Dark things: matter & energy.
I liked the current National Geographic issue, February 2016 article, “Hidden Cosmos”.
I got to it through, http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/01/hidden-cosmos/ferris-text but I don’t think that’s going to work from my Word document.

2. The Temporary Universe
A conversation between Steve Minsky and George Musser on Sept 21st, 2010 titled, “Could Time End[2] - Scientific American”.  I still remember this article blowing my Sci-Fi mind, as it describes time winding down.
I found it at http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/could-time-end-10-09-21/#

3. The Spiritual Universe
I can think of nothing more on point about science and religion than the movie “Contact” two decades ago.  That was clearly the theme of the book and the movie, from start to finish.  I’ll try and include a URL from uTube to remind us all about the movie version.
But first read Roger Ebert’s 2011 reprise of his thoughts on Contact.
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-contact-1997
Trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRoj3jK37Vc
Sorry about the 10-second advertisement.

4. The Symmetrical Universe
  Alan waxes poetic about symmetry in art and nature, but the scientific symmetry he talks about is at the Quantum level.  I thought I’d introduce http://smc-quantum-physics.com/blog.php a current Canadian blog.  If you go to this, click on the navigational tab, “Theses”.  I though the one labelled “Time asymmetric extensions of general relativity” was a perfect way to take a reality check from all the “layman’s articles” we’re reading. All the guys like Alan Lightman and Carl Sagan are real physicists that can read this stuff like we read poetry.  They think in mathematics.
I’ve added this one for Padma & Robin:
 http://www.rroij.com/open-access/finding-bilateral-symmetry-of-the-human-brain-from-mri-33-37.pdf

5. The Gargantuan Universe – I will be passing out 8 X 10 glossy prints of parts of our infinitely large universe as party favors, courtesy of NASA’s Hubble Deep Space telescope.  [It’s our annual Valentine’s Day party].
6. The Lawful UniverseThe reason I loved Science Fiction so much growing up was that it flaunted the known laws of nature.  People traveled at “warp” speed, had time machines, had robots smarter than humans, met alien cultures.  I guess these books didn’t flaunt the Laws as much as they discovered ways around the Laws of Nature.  Here’s a list of books that should go to that little 10-12 year old grandchild or cousin with an inquisitive mind.  We readers always like series, so Foundation, Lensman, Dune, and Gateway are great starters.  http://flavorwire.com/347374/awesome-infographic-the-best-selling-sci-fi-books-of-all-time

7. The Disembodied Universe --   I was just ten year’s old when my family moved to San Jose after World War II.  I was discovering libraries and book stores at that age.  Someone -- teacher, Cub Scout leader, church leader – took me/us to the Rosicrucian Museum and I became hooked on Astronomy and later Cosmology.  The planetarium show had the birth of the universe and of our solar system and all the stars in the sky. Awesome.  They’re still doing it.  Take someone.
http://egyptianmuseumscribe.blogspot.com/2009/02/dream-of-stars-brief-look-at-historic.html

 

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

In the Unlikely Event by Judy Bloome 2016


This is a great fictional memoir: lots of little vignettes and remembrances, woven into short stories

It’s a large book ? 500 pages).  I didn’t have time to finish it before it was called back in.  I’ve been swamped of late and did maybe 15-20 pages a day, which wasn’t enough.

The writing style was pleasant, lightweight, which was good for me at this time.  The time period was the early 50’s which was very comfortable for me.  Many people don’t like to admit they were even alive at that time.

This was a new book and a best seller.  The library has multiple copies, but I’m sure each copy will be gobbled up quickly. 

 

Life Without Parole by Clare O'Donohue 2012


So, the author did some research on prisoners on “Death Row”.  The protagonist is many talented so she has wrangled a short term TV gig as the Director/Reporter for a show on the inside scoop of Life on Death Row.  Interviews and filming are spread over a six weeks, so she has time for accepting another TV gig on remodeling and opening a new restaurant.

Then one of the restaurateurs gets murdered.  And by this time she has bonded favorably with one and unfavorably with another murderer on Death Row. 

So of course she enlists the Death Row guys as expert “consultants” to help her solve the murder.  In the end the Death penalty is cancelled, at least for a while.

This was a Central library book club read that I thought I’d attend, but didn’t.  It was decent enough writing but the plot stories were thinly developed.