This
book is a lesson in the craftsmanship of writing. Patchett’s earlier book, Truth and Beauty, convinced me of the belief that her
writing was penned by the hand of a grandmaster. The opening chapter of this book is my case
in point. She writes a vignette about
announcing her lab-mate’s death to his wife.
It’s a side issue but it allows her ample time to introduce all the
characters and many of the plot lines without any expenditure of effort. It’s like the chess game opening of P-Q4,
perfectly solid, but a bit edgy, hinting at more than the normal challenges.
The next chapter
continues at the leisurely pace of the first; no apparent hurry. She paints in the back-story on Marina Singh,
her MD career destroyed by a horrible error of judgment while doing her
residency. This is brilliantly handled
through the device of her malarial-like delirium while asleep. She dwells excessively on death and
separation in her nightmare.
By almost halfway
through the book, it is obvious that the real story is not about a “Rumble in
the Jungle.” That was just a literary
device. We’ve had 150 pages of exquisite
character development. Patchett adds
three new characters with every chapter, never letting go of the rest. It’s like a juggler’s act, adding in an
additional ball, again and again, from 3 to 6 to 9. The author keeps adding to the depth of the
initial personae: Marina, Mr. Fox, and Anders.
She doesn’t let loose of Karen or Annick either. A deep look at her mid-life crisis also
includes Milton, Jackie, and Barbara. They round out her pre-jungle cast of
characters. Her waking moments of
thought, like her nightmares, are all about paths taken, or not.
Just
before they take off down the Amazon, there is a “makes-you-wanna-go” description of
Manaus. She adds several more characters
here, Tomo, Easter, and Nixon, all while still keeping up the threads with all
the others. It has become noticeable
this deeply into the story that Marina only reacts to people and circumstances,
she does no self-direction of events or activities. She is a feather blowing in the wind: afraid
to make decisions of her own. She yields
to Mr. Fox her older, married boyfriend, Dr. Swenson her Med School mentor,
even Barbara her style guide. Are they
all parental figures like Milton? Did
she never take control of her child-parent relationship?
Into
the thick of it at the Lakashi village, sharing their anthropological mores,
everything wildly alien, the author again takes the time to delve into human
individual differences; not with graphical moments and impossible flora and
fauna; not with fearful creatures: spiders, snakes, birds and bats. The reason I claim we are reading master
craftsmanship in the written word is captured in her relating the scene where
the tribespeople scam Marina out of her clothes – the shirt off her back,
willingly. Patchett captures the
aversion most of us have to a stranger unbuttoning and striping off our shirt
and trousers: the titillation of having a community watch as her breasts are
fondled, as the natives think of maybe getting away with the bra as well. Not a lot of adjectives and adverbs in this
scene, but we are Marina: No! O.K., no,
yes, as she succumbs to their probing – yielding to the communal will.
The penultimate
chapters deal with the half dozen moral questions that are brought up by the
premise of the novel: the search for pharmacology as product; the marketing of
said product; the impact on indigenous people of the search; the resolution of
mid-life crisis by Marina Singh. None of
these ethical dilemmas receives any attention by the author until these moral
chapters, where they are all vocalized: argued from all sides, and then
positions are taken: malaria cure or menopausal avoidance: free cures or
designer drugs or psychedelics; exploitation private or public; Life Part 2
safely as before or challenging the unknown.
Well,
you don’t get rich off of masterful character development. Ann Patchett has tossed in a pinch of
comic-relief:
“Annick Swenson’s
child will be raised by the Lakashi?!” /../ “You went to Radcliffe!”“If we were home I would take him for a CT.”
“If you were home he wouldn’t have been squeezed by an Anaconda!”
And
that last line refers to a lengthy struggle between all our friends and an
18-foot Anaconda, won by Marina Singh.
There are several
other moments of thriller intensity, but all this is nothing compared to the
depths-of-despair / heights-of-glory final chapter where good and evil finally
struggle. Evil represented by the
cannibalistic Hummocca tribe next door.
They usually shoot poison darts first, and then eat the dead. Good is represented by our heroine, at last
making her own decisions. Pirating the
pontoon boat, she goes with the boy Easter to the lair of the Hummocca. There, as suspected, she finds Anders Eckman,
hale and hearty and not dead which was the reason in the beginning for her trip
to the Amazon. She trades Easter for
Anders, her number 2 and 3 solo decisions.
She sleeps with Anders that night back in camp and then takes him home
to his wife the next day. [#’s 4 & 5].
The sixth independent decision would be going back to
the jungle where she thrived, but Ann left that for us to decide.
My second read of this great book
ReplyDelete