I
thoroughly enjoyed reading this book. It
wasn’t the passionate read of six-hour sessions because you just can’t put it
down. So I’m asking myself the question,
“Why was it so good?” It’s not just me,
many other readers whose opinion I value thought it was a “best recent read”.
Of
course there was the dramatic crescendo of the ending and since that was at the
end it sticks with us. You couldn’t help
but shed a tear, even though it was a predictable ending.
I think we are in a
new era of writing about the last century.
In the
era surrounding WW-II, the 30’s, 40-s,
and 50’s there was the John Gunther type of book Inside Europe, a study of the politics of nations, winding
up with William Shirer’s, Rise and
Fall of the Third Reich. Next
came the good guys, bad guys’ era with John Wayne heroes. We’ve just finished a quarter century of le
Carré type espionage and spy novels where the whole cast ensemble are bad guys;
there are no good guys. Now they’ve all
died off.
We have
entered the era of retrospectives on 20th century history: no
politics, no heroes or villains. It is
pleasant reading. It is stories about
little people, commoners. That is why I
think this book has such broad appeal.
Now to some of the specifics:
·
Doerr’s
style of multiple scene slices by time and venue was brilliantly handled. For me, it was just the right mixture. I think that the shortness of the shifts, 1-3
pages, helped to make this work.
·
Characterization
achieved efficient balance. There was no
glut of minor characters; they conveniently crossed the stage and exited. But we got to know and understand the
children. Werner was deeply-layered and
natural; possible based on the author himself.
Making him an orphan was a good literary device; no need to delve into
parentage. The girl, Marie-Laure, is
endearing because of her perseverance, but painted through the reflected visions
of her father and grand-uncle. The
blindness was a perfect device for her, because, like a magic trick, it
diverted attention away from the author going too deeply into a teenage girl’s
character. Another thing that makes these
characters work is the ages: a ten year story, from 6 to 16.
·
There
is the illusion of minute detail on any number of subjects in the children’s lives. We readers don’t really want this to be a
text on radio electronics, nor tide pool crustacean life. But we like to think we have learned
something and we enjoy the detail writing about things that stir passions like
puzzles, museums, and Jules Verne.
·
I
theorize that we are now in an age of a kinder, gentler world view of the last
century. I could make similar comments about
the author, Phillip Kerr, who has written ten novels following the career of
Bernie Gunther over thirty years (1930-1960) from Berlin police Lieutenant to
private eye.
No comments:
Post a Comment