“Calico Joe” is a cute book. Thankfully it is short. I never was able to “suspend my
disbelief.” John Grisham is a good
author; he does a great job portraying people in his legal mileau. Sports is not his thing. The plotline was irritating and almost childishly
contrived. The research work to add in
names, dates, and statistics was superficial and seemed wedged in every so
often separate from the story. Even the
supposed time-frame, 1973, forty years ago feels contrived to appeal to a male
45-65 year-old market segment. I was
left with the feeling that had the release date been six months earlier or
later, this could just as easily been a football book.
The book is a
baseball fairytale with good triumphing over evil, but with no moral at the end.
Calico Joe is 100% good: Warren Tracy
has evil in him. The narrator relates
the tale of each man and their eventual meeting as batter and pitcher on a
baseball diamond. Evil wins that day,but
both men are destroyed as a result of their encounter … .. until Tracy’s son
comes along thirty years later and heals both men, who wind up smiling and
shaking hands.
Most sports
writers deal with real events, sometimes embellished through a writer’s license
to heigthen drama and comedy, romance and sports passion. As a reader, it’s passion that I look for in
sports stories, even the fictional ones.
“The Legend of Bagger Vance”
comes to mind as an ideal golf story.
Set in time far back enough that portrayals of the famous names doesn’t
irritate anyone and the fictional lead characters were believable, all magic
being incorporated into a fictionally acceptable “Bagger.”
With more than a century of baseball history to use as a
backdrop for a novel, why create a new Babe Ruth or Ted Williams. Of course my answer to that question is money:
for film rights. All the real famous
players have either been “done” many times, and/or doing them again would mean
sharing control and profits with others.
“Calico Joe” is 100%
Grisham’s. This slim book reads just
like a film script. When this movie is
made, there will be no grandson, nor other heirs to squabble over the memory of
their father.
I can think of no other reason for writing this book other than
milking another, distinctly different demographic for the movie. I didn’t learn anything from this book. I didn’t develop any sympathy for any of the
characters, good or evil. I couldn’t
help but dislike Warren Tracy because he was portrayed as an evil, mean
bully. There was no “take-away” from
having read this book. It was like the
cliché about hours after eating Chinese food; done, but with an empty feeling. I should have waited for the movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment